Small business lobby is scathing of Commons fracking report

The Onshore Energy Services Group, a trade association that represents small businesses in the onshore oil and gas supply chain, has reacted angrily to a report published by the House of Commons Environmental Audit Committee, which recommends a fracking moratorium.

The Onshore Energy Services Group says that the report fails to take account of the expert opinions of its members, submitted in written evidence to the committee in December, and draws a number of flawed and inaccurate conclusions.

Lee Petts, interim chief executive at the OESG, said: “We are very disappointed with this report, which appears to ignore crucial expert evidence about the safety and regulation of shale gas and other forms of energy extraction.

“Its timing, and the haste with which the inquiry was undertaken, coupled with conclusions that could almost have been written in advance, all suggest that this is just a fig leaf for an attack intended to torpedo the Infrastructure Bill.

“There can be no justification for a further fracking moratorium. Every aspect of shale gas extraction has been carefully and thoroughly assessed in the last three and a half years, with a range of independent academics and institutions all concluding that it can be undertaken safely. Further delay now will only mean that Britain continues to miss out on the environmental and economic benefits of domestically produced shale gas.

“The future prospects of supply chain SMEs are being put in jeopardy by elected representatives using shale gas as a political football, threatening jobs and deterring investment.”

The group points points out that over 99% of all British businesses are SMEs, and that they employ around 60% of the entire UK workforce, accounting for a significant proportion of the voting public.

But it fears that attempts to undermine so-called ‘big oil’ fail to recognise the knock-on impacts for British SMEs in the supply chain that depend on it for survival, and says that smaller companies are disproportionately impacted by the continuing uncertainties.

The climate case for shale gas

Currently, over half the gas we use in Britain is imported.

These imports are responsible for greenhouse gas emissions as a result of pipeline transmission losses from the continent, and the carbon intensity of supplying Liquefied Natural Gas.

But the Commons report overlooks, and therefore fails to take account of, the pipeline losses associated with bringing in natural gas from Norway, Belgium and the Netherlands, over significant distances and through harsh environments. Shale gas, produced onshore in Britain and much closer to the point of consumption, could significantly avoid these pipeline losses of methane, which is a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide. These savings need to be considered in any assessment of the impacts of shale gas production on carbon budgets.

The report recognises, but then ignores, the findings of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the former Chief Scientist at the Department of Energy and Climate Change, and the Government’s own advisors, the Committee on Climate Change, all of whom have concluded that shale gas production can be consistent with our climate targets.

Wider air quality benefits

In 2013, the charity Health and Environmental Alliance published a report claiming that old-style coal fired power stations in the UK are responsible for 1,600 premature deaths every year, and that health complications lead to 360,000 lost working days – putting additional strain on the health service and employers.

Dr Michal Krzyzanowski, visiting professor at King’s College London and formerly with the European Centre for Environment & Health (ECEH) of the World Health Organisation, said: “The scientific evidence that air pollution causes disease is no longer in doubt. Ambient air pollution is recognised as a leading determinant of health globally and in western Europe – and coal combustion is an important source of this pollution. Energy policy must seriously consider the significant health costs resulting from the use of coal.”

Shale gas, being a much cleaner burning fuel, would be responsible for sizeable cuts in air pollutants linked to ill health, such as small particulate matter and heavy metals, if it were used as a substitute for coal in electricity generation.

The Commons report, whilst considering the local air quality impacts of fracking itself, overlooks the much more significant gains that could be made at the national level.

The current regulatory framework is adequate and fit-for-purpose

The report concludes that there is a “fundamental need for a more coherent and more joined-up regulatory system, and one that needs to be put in place before further fracking activity is contemplated.”

Whilst we accept that UK health, safety and environmental laws can appear disjointed to those that are unfamiliar with them, we believe that the regulations that apply to shale gas extraction are nonetheless in place and adequate. There would be little to gain from the expensive and time consuming process of drafting specific new laws, which we consider would be a wasteful use of taxpayer monies.

However, we agree that there would be some merit in producing guidance for public stakeholders that sets out much more clearly the duties imposed by the regulations, how they are enforced, and the consequences of a failure to comply with them, in order to boost public confidence.

Resourcing fracking regulation

The report appears to express some doubt about the ability of the Environment Agency to effectively regulate shale gas in development and production, citing recent budget and staffing cuts.

However, it fails to take account of the fact that, as a regulated activity, operators must pay to obtain the raft of environmental permits that are required, as well as paying an annual subsistence charge to maintain them. Estimates vary because not every location will require the same number and range of permits, and we do not yet know precisely how many active multi-well sites will be necessary to extract the resource – but permitting income could exceed £13 million over 20 years if 100 pads are developed nationally as predicted by the Institute of Directors in 2013.

The social licence to operate

In discussing the requirement for shale gas developers to acquire the so-called social licence to operate, the report fails to consider the proven advantages that smaller supply chain companies offer when it comes to public acceptance.

According to the Edelman Global Trust Barometer in 2013, 78% of Britons said they trust small companies compared to just 48% that said they trusted big businesses.

Until now, despite performing much of the work, supply chain SMEs have had very little visibility or opportunity to engage with public stakeholders.

The OESG is eager to remedy that, and believes that smaller businesses can have a big role to play in changing public attitudes to shale gas.

A further halt cannot be justified

The report concludes that “A halt is also needed on environmental grounds, and it is essential that further independent studies into the impacts of fracking in the UK are completed to help resolve the environmental risk uncertainties.”

We fundamentally disagree.

Given the amount of independent scrutiny to which shale gas and other forms of onshore energy extraction have already been subjected, it is difficult to see what more could be gained from further study that either hasn’t already been considered or couldn’t be better understood by conducting more exploratory drilling.

And just this week, council officers in Lancashire recommended the refusal of two planning applications for shale gas exploration on the basis of noise and traffic impacts and, but importantly not the long list of health, safety and environmental concerns that have featured so prominently in the debate thus far.

The potential economic benefits should not be shunned

The report queries whether UK shale gas could ever be commercially viable, or scale sufficiently to deliver the identified economic potential of extracting the resource. It also suggests that, even if it does scale successfully, it may take too long to do so in order to deliver the anticipated environmental gains.

Calling for a further and unnecessary moratorium at this moment in time would simply delay progress even further.

Given the UK’s reliance on imported gas, which creates no jobs or inward investment and is responsible for a net cash outflow, it is clearly desirable for Britain to produce its own gas instead, but without further exploration, it won’t be possible to fully determine if this is likely. If it does prove possible to recover the gas in commercial quantities, Ernst & Young predict that the supporting supply chain could one day be responsible for a spend of £33 billion whilst employing over 64,500 people. If the majority of the supply chain functions can be performed by British SMEs, that are more likely to recruit and train new people in order to grow, and that pay taxes in Britain, the economic advantages will be amplified.

Enjoyed this? Read more from The Onshore Energy Services Group

Latest news

1

Chiptech announces major innovation initiative at high-profile reception with the New Zealand Prime Minister in London. The Rt Hon Jonathan Reynolds, the Rt Hon Christopher Luxon and the Rt Hon Steve Reed (L-R Front Row) David Hammond, and Daniel Knowles

Chiptech announces major innovation initiative at high-profile reception with the New Zealand Prime Minister in London.

30 Apr 2025

2

Northstone secures full planning permission for 50 new homes in Edenfield Edenfield housing development

Northstone secures full planning permission for 50 new homes in Edenfield

29 Apr 2025

3

Ring Stones Maintenance and Construction celebrates completion of Dovestone Gardens Dovestone Gardens launch

Ring Stones Maintenance and Construction celebrates completion of Dovestone Gardens

29 Apr 2025

4

PHX Training welcomes new business leader to drive learner success Louise Kirby

PHX Training welcomes new business leader to drive learner success

29 Apr 2025

5

Lidl to invest half a billion pounds in its expansion as it eyes sites in Lancashire Lidl

Lidl to invest half a billion pounds in its expansion as it eyes sites in Lancashire

29 Apr 2025

Pc Prestonmacan Gif980x120 March
Background image for hub sign up block

LBV Hub

Leverage Lancashire Business View platforms

Post your news
Post your events
Post your offers
Build your network
Improve your SEO
Gain coverage in the magazine
Sign-up
Events
LBV122 May/June Launch Event
121 Lancashire Business View Magazine Launch
Networking
21 May 2025

LBV122 May/June Launch Event

Lancaster and Morecambe College, Lancaster, LA1 2TY

08:30 - 10:30

Sub36 Networking
Networking
11 Jun 2025

Sub36 Networking

British Jewellery School, Scorton, PR3 1BA

15:00 - 17:00

Lancashire Net Zero Carbon Conference
Net Zero Carbon Social 1200px 2
Networking
18 Jun 2025

Lancashire Net Zero Carbon Conference

Crow Wood Hotel & Spa Resort, Burnley, BB12 0RT

08:30 - 13:00

Lancashire Built Environment Conference 2025
BEC 315 X 315 Px
Networking
25 Sep 2025

Lancashire Built Environment Conference 2025

Blackpool Football Club, Blackpool, FY1 6HX

08:30 - 13:00

CMI Level 5 Management and Leadership Course
UCLanAerialCampus.jpg.jpg
LBV Hub Seminars
21 Feb 2025 - 21 Feb 2026

CMI Level 5 Management and Leadership Course

Preston Campus, Preston , PR1 2HE

09:00 - 17:00

CMI Level 5 Project Management Course
UCLanAerialCampus.jpg.jpg
LBV Hub Seminars
21 Feb 2025 - 21 Feb 2026

CMI Level 5 Project Management Course

Preston Campus, Preston, PR1 2HE

08:00 - 17:00

RISE - The Academy for Female Leaders and Managers
WENDY BOWERS RISE Illustrstion copy.jpg.jpg
LBV Hub Seminars
02 Apr 2025 - 08 Oct 2025

RISE - The Academy for Female Leaders and Managers

East Lancashire Chamber of Commerce, Clayton le Moors, BB5 5JR

09:00 - 15:30

Planning for the future + navigating Inheritance Tax changes
Planning for the future + navigating Inheritance Tax changes for website.png.png
LBV Hub Seminars
01 May 2025 - 01 May 2025

Planning for the future + navigating Inheritance Tax changes

Stanley House Hotel, Mellor, Blackburn, BB2 7NP, Blackburn, BB2 7NP

08:00 - 10:30

Advantage: AI – A Workshop for Business Leaders – May 2
EV-land-2025-05B.png.png
LBV Hub Seminars
02 May 2025 - 02 May 2025

Advantage: AI – A Workshop for Business Leaders – May 2

Door4 Office, Burnley Wharf, Manchester Road, Burnley, BB11 1JG

09:00 - 11:00

A night at the races
1.png.png
LBV Hub Dinners / Balls
02 May 2025 - 02 May 2025

A night at the races

Morecambe FC, Morecambe, LA4 4TB

19:00 - 23:59

Celebrating 50 years of KTP
UCLanAerialCampus.jpg.jpg
LBV Hub Networking
07 May 2025 - 07 May 2025

Celebrating 50 years of KTP

University of Central Lancashire , Preston, PR1 2HE

16:00 - 18:00

Research and Knowledge Exchange Showcase
13421_research_knowledge_exchange_2025_600x300.jpg.jpg
LBV Hub Awards
07 May 2025 - 08 May 2025

Research and Knowledge Exchange Showcase

University of Central Lancashire , Preston, PR1 2HE

09:00 - 17:00

Advertise with us

Reaching 50,000 members, our print, digital and event platforms offer a fantastic way to raise your business profile and help you grow.

Find out more Lbv121 Online Graphic
Subscribe now

Weekly news bulletin